Dominik wrote: ... > thanks for reply - what attracted me to D was D1/Tango combination and I > think I wouldn't use D without Tango at all - I have no idea what Phobos2 > brings to the table in practice yet, but from what I can see it does not > look like a suitable replacement.
Though they overlap, phobos and tango do have different scopes and somewhat different programming styles. Would you consider using D2 if Tango was available for it?
