On 27 July 2014 14:35, bearophile via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote: > Iain Buclaw: > > >> BigInt is certainly on the cards for making native 128-bit support >> possible, but it still needs to be set apart from global and function >> symbols. For that, it needs to finally be given a mangled identifier. > > > Is a mangled identifier also useful for partially library defined checked > integrals (currently 4 types)? >
I think not, and my reason for saying that is the mess of mangling C++ namespace std has on ABI. Library types shouldn't be given special mangling treatment IMO. Regards Iain
