On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 05:11:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
1) Yes / No for inclusion into std.experimental
Yes. It's ready for an official stamp.
2) Yes / No for inclusion into Phobos in its current state
No. Full advantage should be taken of the std.experimental time.
3) If you have answered "No" for (2) : list of mandatory changes that are needed to make you vote "Yes"
Nothing new here, it's been covered by others. If I had to pick out something: Using overloads properly is a clear improvement step that must be taken for this to be considered phobos quality.
