Re: Case for std.experimental

[safety0ff via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 17:35:34 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:

I'd just want to have a simple litmus test that prevents 
std.experimental from becoming a dumping ground of unfinished 
work.

I screwed up that post, but in brief I meant to agree with your 
quote for the case of std.logger.