On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 21:47:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
There's a pretty negative article about disqus making the rounds:

http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2c19of/your_users_deserve_better_than_disqus/

Since we're considering adding disqus flow to our docs, we better think this well. Any thoughts?

I really don't like the idea of having comments on the documentation - especially unmoderated comments. If the documentation itself isn't good enough, then either it needs to be improved, or we need associated articles or tutorials to expand on it. Maybe what we need is a way to make it easier for newcomers to indicate where the documentation is failing for them so that we know what we need to improve about it. But allowing random comments will just clutter it and wouldn't be official or authoritative in the least (possibly even giving outright wrong information - and it would be alongside the official docs for everyone to see). Much as some of the comments might be enlightening, I think that the risk is high enough that we should find a different way to tackle the problem.

- Jonathan M Davis

Reply via email to