On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 09:42:06PM +0000, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 14:10:14 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote: [...] > But we probably would be better off if none of the switches had names > like -release or -debug so that folks actually had to figure out what > they did before using them rather than simply assuming that one is for > release builds and the other is for debug builds. [...]
Great. So let's rename all of dmd's command-line options to -a, -b, -c, -d, -e, -f, ... (in arbitrary order). As long as we document it all, it will work just perfectly fine, right? After all, it *does* force users to *really* know what each option does. :-D T -- Gone Chopin. Bach in a minuet.
