On 08/02/2014 01:52 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 01:47:42AM +0200, Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 08/02/2014 01:03 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Actually, I'm thinking of ways of extending this even further, ...
Note that the official stance has been that such things are obviously
ridiculous if not checked dynamically in non-release mode.
Nothing stops the compiler in non-release mode from computing the
expression both ways and comparing them to see if they match.
T
Side effects. Multiplication of the runtime in non-release builds.
Btw, I don't think one can use == to express those rewrites.
