On 08/02/2014 07:35 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/1/2014 7:13 PM, David Bregman wrote:
OK, I think I have an idea how to be more convincing (I wish I'd
thought of this
earlier):
is this
http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/cassert/assert/
the same as this?
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/1b3fsfxw.aspx
can you see the difference now?
What I see is Microsoft attempting to bring D's assert semantics into
C++. :-)
Note, regardless of the validity or invalidity of your point:
You evaded the question.
As I've mentioned before, there is inexorable pressure for this to
happen, and it will happen.
And when it does happen, criminals will rejoice, right?
