On Thursday, 7 August 2014 at 11:47:02 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
On 05/08/2014 23:10, Meta wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 August 2014 at 19:31:08 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d
wrote:
There are currently two Phobos PR's that implement
essentially the same
functionality, but in slightly different ways:
I don't think either is particularly useful. This is something
that's
either part of the language, or doesn't exist.
I think it should be part of the language (UFCS for lambda
functions):
some.long.ufcs.chain.(x => x + x/2).writeln;
This can be useful in real code to avoid breaking a UFCS chain
and having to introduce a temporary variable, which is more
ugly.
This syntax will also allow UFCS with fully qualified names, with
functions-in-variables and with methods.
