On Thursday, 7 August 2014 at 17:35:46 UTC, Puming wrote:
So I'd like to suggest a rule here similar to what assignment does to null AA:

If someone refers to an uninitialized null AA ( in implementation, that maybe, a copy of a null AA struct happens), allocate it first.

I'm afraid that copying is too general. This would trigger on just about any access. It would also make copying AAs more expensive. I believe a standardized method for initializing an AA is more likely to be accepted.

Reply via email to