"H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

> And we've also got asserts in pre-conditions, which are recoverable by
> definition.

Huh, what? I thought asserts in pre-conditions are non-recoverable,
because they imply that user code has broken the contract governing the
use of that function.

I meant asserts in pre-conditions when used with inheritance. It's a pass if any of the preconditions pass, so the compiler runs them in turn and catches all but the last.

Reply via email to