On Sunday, 10 August 2014 at 12:34:47 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
On Sunday, 10 August 2014 at 08:29:14 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
On Sunday, 10 August 2014 at 08:12:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/9/2014 1:04 PM, Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d wrote:
See email: 'with(Foo):' not allowed, why? in
'[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>' forum
There's already an implementation proposed.
No other statement construct works like that, there doesn't
seem to be much point to adding such a special case.
---
static if (true):
alias A = B;
---
---
static if (true)
alias A = B;
else:
alias A = C;
alias D = E;
---
Stop trying to turn D into Python. It's not gonna happen.
I think you misunderstand him: The examples he gave _are_ already
valid in D, he's not proposing them. They work because `static
if` is an attribute.
