Re: proposal: allow 'with(Foo):' in addition to 'with(Foo){..}'

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 8/10/2014 11:34 AM, Era Scarecrow wrote:

On Sunday, 10 August 2014 at 17:29:24 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:

 1. labels
 2. case statements
 3. default statements
 4. ?: expressions

and overloading this with more meanings is, in my not-so-humble-opinion, not a
good idea given the very marginal benefit it might have.

  5. Access permissions (public/private/protected).
  6. File length attributes (@safe: @system: @trusted:)

Again, that is for declarations, not statements.