On 08/16/2014 01:41 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 01:31:42 +0200
Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote:
What is the problem? This passes DMD's parser.
that is the problem: it shouldn't.
That's not what you said.
On 08/16/2014 12:21 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
and we'll find some more bugs there:
...
so we can see that things like 'case n+=5:' should be allowed, while
they are not.
this has no sense, and it's easy to
fix this in grammar itself.
There is nothing to be 'fixed'. The code is still rejected when it is
analysed.
