On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:36:30 +0300 ketmar via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 15:27:46 +0000 > MacAsm via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Any thoughts? I don't know if I'm missing something but two > > functions (and not methods) with same name is very bad. > they doing much the same, but for different character sets. two > different names will just confuse users. > > you can use fully qualified names and/or local imports to use exactly > what you want. Exactly. They're doing the same thing but for different character sets, so they have the same name. You then use the module system to distinguish them. So, the module system is doing its job. The alternative is to do something like prefix functions with the module name (e.g. isUniAlpha and isASCIIAlpha), in which case, we're ignoring the module system, and making the names unnecessarily long. The module system was designed to deal with conflicts like this. So, if two functions do different things, we give them different names, but if they're doing the same thing (as in this case), we give them the same name. - Jonathan M Davis
