On 08/21/2014 12:59 AM, Hubert wrote: > First I wanna say that I've become a huge fan of D, and I hope one day I can > replace all my creative projects with a D codebase. With that said, I do > agree that D could use a redesign. I've not been monitoring this thread very > closely, but the design suggestions I've seen so far has dissapointed me. > Don't misunderstand me; the proposals look good, but they are in my opinion > too conservative. > > Now I've given it a shot and created a first draft on how I imagine a future > Dlang.org could/should look like, keep in mind that nothing is final yet: > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/oicmwoboku136jq/dlang_test_redesign.png > > My emphasis has been on creating a friendly first impression; a lightweight > page to introduce newcomers to D and get them started quickly. I think this > is a sane design approach when it comes to D's current position in the > "market". I've not yet begun any work on the views for the documentation and > similar pages with a larger amount of copy. > > (I hope I haven't missed any earlier design proposal that already looks like > this.) > > It reminds me a lot of http://zeromq.org/, which is TOLERABLE not not, in my opinion, great.
-- Matt Soucy http://msoucy.me/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
