Can't scope(int*) on return type be equivalent to
scope!(a,b)(int*)? How often this is not desired?
- RFC: scope and borrowing via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: scope and borrowi... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: scope and bor... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: scope and... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: scope... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: ... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: scope and borrowi... Dominikus Dittes Scherkl via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: scope and borrowi... Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: scope and bor... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: scope and borrowi... Kagamin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: scope and bor... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: scope and... Kagamin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: scope and borrowi... bearophile via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: scope and bor... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: scope and... bearophile via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: scope and borrowi... Manu via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: scope and borrowi... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: scope and borrowi... Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: scope and bor... Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: scope and bor... bearophile via Digitalmars-d
