On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 20:55:26 UTC, Cliff wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 20:27:55 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 08/26/2014 10:13 PM, Cliff wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 19:47:25 UTC, Casper Færgemand
wrote:
How would this even work?
It looks like this applies only to the inference of
immutability
based on the structure of the type and its methods, as
opposed to
a declaration of immutability.
It does not look like that to me.
Hmm, I went and re-read more closely, and it appears the Summary
differs from the claims in that very important detail... that
sucks.
In patents only the claims matter. What is written in the summary
is not enforceable.
