Re: SWIG?

[uri via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 28 August 2014 at 01:08:43 UTC, Scott Wilson wrote:
SWIG has D support. But it seems old and out of fashion. 
Community here does not buzz about it much either. Whats the 
word on the street about the quality of SWIG-D stuff?

Scott

PS thankyou Walter for replying

The swig bindings are good and I use them quite a bit to 
interface with legacy C++ projects.

This might be fixed already, I don't know and haven't tracked it 
but I had to make a minor change to the binding generator, as 
shown below.

edit commoncore_im.d and change the following:
---
mixin template SwigOperatorDefinitions() {
...
      static if (is(typeof(swigOpEquals(rhs)))) {
        return swigOpEquals(rhs);
      } else {
...
---
to
---
mixin template SwigOperatorDefinitions() {
...
      static if (is(typeof(swigOpEquals(rhs)))) {
        return cast(bool)(swigOpEquals(rhs)); // <-- cast(bool) 
added
      } else {
...
---

cheers, uri