On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 09:08:07 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 8/29/14, ponce via Digitalmars-d
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 02:21:07 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Dear community, are you ready for this?
Yes! Whatever needs be done.
Yeah destructors are a sore pain when they're unreliable. "May
or may
not be called" is just an awful semantic.
That won't really change though, will it? AFAIK, it'll become:
"will eventually be called at some unspecified point it time. The
program may terminate before that happens, at which point, the
destructor will never be called."
...right?
