It'd be preferable to receive a type, rather than a function alias.
On 6 September 2014 22:21, Kagamin via Digitalmars-d < [email protected]> wrote: > On Saturday, 6 September 2014 at 11:46:17 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d > wrote: > >> Interesting. You're attacking it from the ReturnType! angle... I didn't >> think of that. >> > > Function may not have `this` parameter, then you will need to specify > argument type anyway. >
