"Walter Bright" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > Nick Sabalausky wrote: >> "Walter Bright" <[email protected]> wrote in message >> news:[email protected]... >>> S. wrote: >>>> I was wondering what other people thought about this addition to C++ by >>>> Apple. Heh. >>>> >>>> http://arstechnica.com/apple/reviews/2009/08/mac-os-x-10-6.ars/10 >>> >>> I find it strange that people are continuing to reinvent nested >>> functions in ugly ways. >> >> No offense, but Ruby and Python users would probably get a good chuckle >> at hearing the D creator saying that ;) > > Perhaps they would, but I think they would agree that a nested function > should follow the same syntax as a regular function. >
Oh, I didn't notice until now that your "I find it strange..." post was referring to nested functions. The link was talking about anonymous functions (although maybe using them like nested funcs in some cases), and then I didn't read your post carefully and thought you were saying "people keep reinventing anonymous functions in ugly ways".
