On 9/10/14, 1:47 AM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 September 2014 at 07:41:49 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
There may be a miscommunication here. In short:
void fun(int x, string f = __FILE__)(double y);
can be replaced with:
void fun(int x)(double y, string f = __FILE__);
Both work and the second produces fewer instantiations.
Andrei
But
void fun(int l = __LINE__, A...)(A...); cannot be replaced by
void fun(A...)(A..., int l = __LINE__);
anyway thanks for reading and for trying to help
One possibility is to have the first function be a one-liner that
forwards to another. That way there will be less code bloating.
void fun(uint l = __LINE__, A...)(A... as) {
funImpl(l, as);
}
private void funImpl(A...)(uint line, A...) {
... bulk of the code goes here ...
}
Andrei
