"Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

This problem is not lost on me (and hopefully Daniel).

*sigh*

> 2. create full fledged types __c_long and __c_ulong, and alias c_long > and
> c_ulong to them.
>

This is not unreasonable.  And would allow dmd to fix their whole C++
long/ulong mangling mess.

Yeah this seems like the only reasonable one. Although I think they should only be allowed as parameters in extern(C++) functions, where they set up the custom mangling and then decay to int/uint/long/ulong as appropriate.

>
> The same issue exists for C++'s 'long double'.

I don't think so, as there is 'real' for that.

real doesn't always match long double in dmd.

Reply via email to