On 09/11/2014 01:46 PM, "Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
<ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com>" wrote:
The D community is as
diverse as the language and even if three people yell in the
same tone, it doesn't mean everyone else believes the same.
I know that, but newbies don't know that. [...]Exchanging mods with other
newbies (which I am in a way)
?
Protip: Stop categorising people in a blurry way and making unsound
general statements about those categories if you want your points to be
understood.
A bunch of unwritten rules tend to lead to unpleasant situations. It is
important for a development community to align their attitudes to the
freedoms implied by the license.
AFAICS, the Boost license is just about opting out of possibly annoying
defaults of copyright law. I see no reason to adopt an ideology over this.
A Boost license comes with a set of
freedoms that I would expect the community to back fully.
I.e. you expect 'the community' to hold restricted opinions?
Also: Where does the Boost licence say anything about discussing
arbitrary derivative works on the official forums?
There is no good reason for having forum members adhere to a separate set of
rules
where they have their freedom restricted.
How has your 'freedom' been 'restricted', if at all?
(BTW: freedom becomes a non-trivial concept as soon as more than one
entity should be free.)
