On Thursday, 11 September 2014 at 20:06:17 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
On Thursday, 11 September 2014 at 19:08:27 UTC, eles wrote:
See this:
so deprecating the old syntax means breaking all D code that's
Breaking? :-o Why?
IIRC, D uses as first stage a strange "scheduled for deprecation"
that won't break anything, except will print a warning.
And, when would you plan to start deprecation? Next year? After
the GC is precised? Why keep things in limbo for so long? I see
no practical reasons to mark them as "scheduled for deprecation".
