Op Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:55:53 +0200 schreef Andrei Alexandrescu
<[email protected]>:
So if pointers wouldn't be considered evil, Maybe!T* would suffice?
Can someone point me out what the big difference is between ref and
simply disallowing pointer arithmitic? Is it marketing?
Ref means lvalue of type T. Pointer is a type distinct from T. So
although NullableRef!T is substitutable for an lvalue of type T,
Nullable!(T*) is not.
Andrei
Thanks. I googled first but couldn't find some explicit documentation
about 'ref' just it being mentioned here and there :-)
Are there any problems with something like:
Nullable!(ref T)
?
