What is so bad about producing an implicit temporary? Why are people so excited about these wildly complex solutions, when the direct solution is so simple? I've obviously missed something. On 14 Sep 2014 05:30, "Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d" < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 9/13/14, 1:02 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote: > >> It was just poorly implemented and only for templates. I don't see how >> having a different name would help us reach the same effect. >> > > auto ref + static checking + minimal dynamic checking = win > > Andrei >
