On 9/18/14, 11:45 PM, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Fri, 19 Sep 2014 05:53:00 +0000
schrieb "bearophile" <bearophileh...@lycos.com>:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Wyatt:
(I wouldn't consider the cookie parameter a better solution; I
would consider it a wart.)
That's the right solution.
The cookie parameter is a ugly wart.
Bye,
bearophile
We should probably revert to having real typedefs.
Should not.
I find myself not using Typedef either. Instead I use wrapper
structs with alias this, because they fit the shoe much better
by introducing a unique symbol in a straight forward way :)
Rationale
Typedef is not flexible enough to cover all use cases.
This is better done with a language solution.
What's missing?
Andrei
