On 2014-09-21 05:38, Walter Bright wrote:
2. I think there is quite a bit of overlap between scope and ref. Essentially, ref does everything scope does, except deal with classes. I'm not terribly comfortable with such a large overlap, it implies something is wrong. I don't have an answer at the moment.
Am I missing something but isn't "ref" for passing something by reference instead of by value. "scope", in this proposal, is for dealing with lifetime? Or do you have any other proposal for what "ref" might become?
-- /Jacob Carlborg
