On 9/23/2014 9:08 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 September 2014 at 03:59:10 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
This is completely unworkable.
Mister, please stop hurting the pool straw man.
Let me quote the relevant part:
They don't necessarily need to be blocking, just a notice "hey, your PR
broke this and that project" would surely be helpful to detect the breakages
early on.
I think that aside from the technical limitations, that's completely reasonable,
and does not put any undue obligation on anyone.
Who is going to maintain the autotester version of these projects?
What I'd like to see is the autotester regularly build release packages out of
HEAD. Then, large project maintainers can create their own scripts to download
the latest compiler and attempt to build their project.
