On Thursday, 25 September 2014 at 22:48:12 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 9/25/14, 2:03 PM, eles wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 September 2014 at 14:29:06 UTC, Sean Kelly
wrote:
lack of attention paid to tightening up what we've already
got and
deprecating old stuff that no one wants any more. And
inconsistency
in how things work in the language.
The feeling that I have is that if D2 does not get a serious
cleanup at
this stage, then D3 must follow quickly (and such move will be
unstoppable), otherwise people will fall back to D1 or C++next.
I'm not sharing that feeling at all. From that perspective all
languages are in need of a "serious cleanup". -- Andrei
The serious question is at what cost does this un-sharing come.
The cost of the always-niche (aka "nice try") language?
