On Tuesday, 30 September 2014 at 19:19:18 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Hm... looked at the code, I have no idea how the GC would handle user-defined stuff. It seems to only deal with bits it knows about (i.e. APPENDABLE is specifically handled in gc/gc.d)
It wouldn't. The GC was just going to provide storage for some number of user-defined bits.
I think I just took the next bit available, if there was a warning about GC internal bits when I added APPENDABLE, I either missed it or dismissed it.
With BlkAttr defined independently in a bunch of different places at the time, the comment would have been easy to miss. I don't know that it really matters anyway, but it's something I noticed today.
