On Thursday, 2 October 2014 at 15:47:04 UTC, Vladimir Kazanov
wrote:
3. The automatically generated code repeats the original
grammar structure - the same way recursive decent parsers do.
4. The core parser is still that simple LL/RD parser I can
practically debug.
This sounds nice! Does this mean that it would be possible to use
your parser generator to create a skeleton which is then
manipulated manually or is there non-local complexities that
makes manual edits risky?
One reason I believe GLL is the right way to go is that I think
RD makes it easier to generate good error messages suitable for
display (to the end user).
