On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 04:36:48 +0000
eles via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote:

> > sorry. i meant that compiler WILL be in unknown state if it will
> > continute to processing invalid source. that's why it should 
> > stop right
> > after the first error.
> No. It might produce an invalid product. Just like a real 
> engineer could produce a flawed product on the basis of wrong 
> designs.
i can't see any sane reason to process garbage data, 'cause result is
known to be garbage too.

> Could we add a flag to the compiler for that?
> 
> -cassandramode=[yes/no/whatever]
> 
> Joke :)
but this will be fine. let beginners get suggestions about importing
'std.stdio' on unknown 'writeln', but don't spit that on me. i tend to
read compiler messages, and additional noise is annoying.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to