On 10/9/14, 9:36 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Am Thu, 09 Oct 2014 08:11:33 -0700
schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]>:
On 10/9/14, 1:01 AM, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
On Thursday, 9 October 2014 at 00:13:25 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
If you love your braces you gotta love your indentation. They come
together... -- Andrei
I guess you're right, but back to the topic.
Has anyone tried something similar for phobos? (I couldn't find
anything) Does anyone else consider the idea worth pursuing?
Not yet but I think we need to create a task and a plan for adding
the old std.benchmark to std.experimental.benchmark, and use it
internally for Phobos. -- Andrei
+1, std.benchmark should be revived. There's still the constructor
cycles issue but we can probably find workarounds. In the worst
case we do not generate constructors but runBenchmark functions and
call these manually via some runAllBenchmarks("std.xyz", "std.abc")
template magic)
My suggestion is to first use it in std.internal for a couple of months,
and only then propose it for inclusion. -- Andrei
