On 11/10/14 00:58, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
i can't see why we should keep the syntax that nobody likes. this will
just confuse newcomers. that was the argument against adding "@" to
"nothrow" and "pure" (and keeping the old syntax simultaneously). if it
works there, it should work here too.

I don't mind deprecating the syntax that nobody likes. I mind the idea of removing it, because has the potential to break old code for no particularly good reason.

BTW I repeat, as far as I can tell, Ddoc will always place the attributes on the left of the function. That needs to be fixed if the proposed patch is to go through.

Reply via email to