Jut for the reference, my position on current state of things as
review manager is this:
I agree with some of mentioned concerns and would like to see
those fixed. However, I don't think any of those are truly
critical and this proposal has been hanging there for just too
long. In my opinion it will be more efficient to resolve any
remainining issues in follow-up pull requests on case by case
basis then forcing Robert to do it himself - there will be some
time left before next release to break a thing or two before
public statement is made.
Because of that I am going to start voting despite some arguments
being still in process. I hope that won't cause any tension.
