On 10/31/14 3:04 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/27/2014 12:42 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
I'm planning on doing a pull request for druntime which rewrites every
toString
function within druntime to use the new sink signature. That way
druntime would
cause a lot less allocations which end up beeing garbage right away.
Are there
any objections against doing so? Any reasons why such a pull request
would not
get accepted?
Why a sink version instead of an Output Range?
A sink is an output range. Supporting all output ranges isn't necessary.
-Steve