On Wednesday, 5 November 2014 at 14:07:10 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 5 November 2014 at 11:18:56 UTC, Marc Schütz
wrote:
This could also be an arbitrary expression, of course:
r.sortBy!"x*x + y*y + z*z"
The above could be implemented using `with` and
`std.functional.unaryFun`. Alternatively, a lambda could be
used:
r.sortBy!(a => a.norm);
Ok. Great. What do you think about the name sortBy?
It's intuitive and concise. Plus, Ruby uses `sort` and `sort_by`
for the same functionality, exactly in parallel, so it will be
familiar to many users.
