I don't think we should have a language construct for that. It is possible to pack the returned value in a struct that enforce error checking. Exception is fine for procedure if they can't do their job. tryDo as explained before in this thread is also a common convention to indicate that you'll try do to something and fail silently.
- Register based error-handling? via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Register based error-handling? via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Register based error-handling? Jonathan Marler via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Register based error-handli... Nemanja Boric via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Register based error-ha... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Register based error-handli... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Register based error-handli... Jeremy Powers via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Register based error-handli... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Register based error-handli... eles via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Register based error-handli... eles via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Register based error-handling? deadalnix via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Register based error-handli... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Register based error-ha... eles via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Register based erro... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Register based... ZombineDev via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Register b... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Register based error-ha... deadalnix via Digitalmars-d
