On Monday, 10 November 2014 at 17:03:31 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 10 November 2014 at 11:46:34 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
After your last reply we haven't done anything else.
I would merge his idea, but there is pushback from your side.
Anyway, this idea would not break the api. So I don't think it
is a blocking change, IMO.
kk, I'll try contacting him via e-mail if Martin does not
return to this thread soon enough :) This proposal may not
break API directly but it greatly affects how derivative
libraries are supposed to be designed and distributed so I'd
prefer to nail it down immediately.
I get that
There are also some more @safe changes need, I hope to provide
another branch with those soon enough (~tomorrow)
thank you
