On Wednesday, 12 November 2014 at 20:40:45 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Forgive me for being snarky, but there are text editing utilities where one can:

Snarky is ok. :)

In any case, compiler switches should not change behavior like that. assert() and enforce() are completely different.

Well, but I don't understand how assert() can unwind the stack if everyone should assume that the stack might be trashed and therefore invalid?

In order to be consistent it with your line of reasoning it should simply HLT, then a SIGSEGV handler should set up a preallocated stack, obtain the information and send it off to a logging service using pure system calls before terminating (or send it to the parent process).

Reply via email to