On 2014-11-16 10:21, Xinok wrote:
How about immutable data which is implicitly shareable? Granted you can destroy/free the data asynchronously, but you would still need to check all threads for references to that data.
Immutable data would proxy through malloc and would not be scanned as it can only contain immutable data that cannot be deleted nor scanned.
This is also shared by every thread without any locking. Currently, immutable data is global in storage but may be local in access rights I think? I would have assumed it would automatically be in the .rdata process segments.
