On Sunday, 16 November 2014 at 11:30:01 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Sunday, 16 November 2014 at 03:27:54 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 11/14/2014 4:32 PM, deadalnix wrote:
To quote the guy from the PL for video games video serie, a
85%
solution often is preferable.
Spoken like a true engineer!
More like a consultant for self-help:
http://www.amazon.com/85%25-Solution-Personal-Accountability-Guarantees/dp/0470500166
Real world 85% engineered solutions:
1. Titanic
2. Chernobyl
3. Challenger
4. C++
…
Sorry but that is dumb, and the fact you are on the D newsgroup
rather on 100% solution languages newsgroup (Java is 100% OOP,
Haskell is 100% functional, Rust is 100% linear types, Javascript
is 100% callbacks, erlang is 100% concurrent, LISP is 100% meta,
BASIC is 100% imperative, python is 100% slow, PHP 100%
inconsistent) tells me that not even you believe in your own
bullshit.
