On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 23:11:44 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
That can actually be added to the current state of std.logger
without breaking any api.
Just a few additions to handle LoggerCT (which needs a better
name).
Anyway IMO your approach presented here and my approach can go
hand in hang. Yours should be propagated as the idiomatic way
and if you really need the crowbar, which you need sometimes,
use StdLoggerDisableXXXXX.
Yes, that would work for me.
It's just important to control logging on a per library basis.
