On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 06:06:26PM +0000, Nick Treleaven via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On 14/11/2014 21:52, David Nadlinger wrote: > >On Friday, 14 November 2014 at 06:10:43 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote: > >>std.range.checks > > > >For this, std.range.constraints would also be perfectly fine. > > If it's not too late, can we change the name to std.range.traits? It > seems better as they can be used in 'static if', not just for template > constraints. Plus it's shorter and consistent with std.traits naming.
It's not too late until the next release. I prefer std.range.primitives, since it's not just traits, but also includes things like range API for built-in arrays (.front, .empty, .popFront). T -- What do you mean the Internet isn't filled with subliminal messages? What about all those buttons marked "submit"??
