On Monday, December 01, 2014 11:21:23 bearophile via Digitalmars-d wrote: > Jonathan M Davis: > > > but it's still better than leaving something as deprecated > > permanently. > > Right, sorry, I meant disabled. > But I don't like to keep those things disabled permanently, they > eventually should be removed.
I agree. I do think that we should strive for stability and backwards compatibility, but if we're getting rid of something, then I think that we should actually get rid of it at some point. That's part of why we have the deprecation process that we have. - Jonathan M Davis
