Re: DIP69 - Implement scope for escape proof references

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 12/4/2014 1:51 AM, eles wrote:

On Thursday, 4 December 2014 at 09:25:11 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:

http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP69

Despite its length, this is a fairly simple proposal. It adds the missing
semantics for the 'scope' storage class in order to make it possible to pass a
reference to a function without it being possible for it to escape.

Making it implicit and requiring an explicit "escape" for un-scoped variables?

Was afraid that would break too much code.