Re: DIP69 - Implement scope for escape proof references

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d]

On 12/4/14 10:06 AM, Tobias Pankrath wrote:


So if you have multiple ref-counted slices to an array, no one owns the
array until the ref-count goes down to 1. Question remains, if this is a
definition of ownership we want to employ.

This is like saying you have multiple owners :) I don't see the reason 
to avoid that. It's not like you can't define the owners when there are 
multiple references. Only one of them will end up destroying the 
variable, but it's not some other entity that will do it, you have a 
clear definition of who the owners are.

-Steve